Senator Natasha Challenges Court Jurisdiction, Accuses FG Of Political Witch-hunt

Suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has launched a ineligible situation against the national authorities implicit transgression defamation charges filed against her. She described the determination arsenic a politically-motivated witch-hunt and an maltreatment of authorities power.

Filing preliminary objections earlier some the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory and the Federal High Court, the senator’s ineligible squad insisted that the prosecutions, initiated pursuing complaints by Senate President Godswill Akpabio and erstwhile Kogi State governor, Yahaya Bello, are unconstitutional, frivolous, and designed to intimidate absorption voices.

The charges, filed pursuing petitions by Senate President Godswill Akpabio and erstwhile Governor Yahaya Bello, stem from the Senator‘s alleged statements.

Akpoti-Uduaghan’s ineligible team, led by 4 Senior Nigerian advocates, contends that the prosecutions are unconstitutional and aimed astatine shielding the complainants‘ backstage reputations alternatively than protecting nationalist involvement oregon nationalist security.

Her counsel submitted exhibits demonstrating that the statements autumn wrong nationalist sermon and media commentary.

Central to the Senator’s objection is the statement that the AGF lacks locus standi to prosecute defamation connected behalf of backstage individuals.

Her lawyers asseverate that defamation matters are inherently civilian successful quality and that attempting to criminalize them constitutes intimidation, suppresses escaped speech, and misuses the transgression justness system.

Senator Natasha further contends that the charges were brought without due investigation, contrasting sharply with her ain petitions alleging threats to her beingness by the complainants, which she claimed were ignored.

She argues that this selective enforcement violates her law rights, peculiarly Section 42, and represents discriminatory prosecution due to the fact that of her absorption governmental affiliation.

In conclusion, the Senator’s defence team, comprising Prof. Roland Otaru, SAN; Dr. E. West-Idahosa, SAN; J.J. Usman, SAN; and M.J. Numa, SAN, urges the courts to disregard the cases astatine the preliminary stage, informing that allowing the prosecutions to proceed would undermine the integrity of the justness strategy and discarded taxpayers’ resources.