Fat Joe Says Lawyer Used AI to Write Legal Briefs In Extortion Lawsuit, Cited ‘Fictional’ Cases

1 month ago 39

The rapper claims an opposing lawyer should beryllium punished for utilizing AI to bash his ineligible enactment for him -- and that it's not the archetypal time.

Fat Joe astatine  Dick Clark's New Year's Rockin' Eve with Ryan Seacrest connected  December 31, 2024.

Fat Joe astatine Dick Clark's New Year's Rockin' Eve with Ryan Seacrest connected December 31, 2024. Gilbert Flores

Fat Joe is accusing lawyers for his erstwhile hypeman Terrance “T.A.” Dixon of sloppily utilizing artificial quality to constitute ineligible briefs successful their ongoing courtroom conflict – including by citing “hallucinations” of ineligible cases that “simply don’t exist.”

Joe (Joseph Cartagena) sued Dixon earlier this year, claiming helium was extorting him by making “wholly fabricated, grotesque, and scandalous allegations.” Dixon past sued backmost months later, leveling shocking accusations of underage enactment against the hep hop legend.

But successful a caller filing Friday, Joe accuses Dixon’s lawyer Tyrone Blackburn of thing altogether different: utilizing an AI chatbot to bash his enactment for him — and making galore mistakes successful the process.

“There are astatine slightest 10 instances successful the question wherever defendants mention cases for inapposite propositions oregon quotes connection recovered obscurity successful the case, commonly referred to arsenic ‘hallucinated’ lawsuit citations, which, successful each likelihood, were the effect of Blackburn’s irresponsible reliance connected artificial quality generated content,” Joe’s lawyers write.

Since the AI roar began, lawyers crossed the state person gotten into occupation for utilizing it successful court. In 1 high-profile lawsuit earlier this year, a Wyoming national justice punished 2 lawyers from idiosyncratic wounded steadfast Morgan & Morgan for citing AI-fabricated cases successful a suit against Walmart.

Blackburn has already faced akin censure. In June, a national justice threatened sanctions aft the lawyer filed a question containing “non-existent quotations” and different AI-generated errors – and past did truthful again successful a little defending his conduct: “The tribunal views Blackburn’s behaviour arsenic a wide ethical usurpation of the highest order.”

After helium was fired by his lawsuit successful that case, Blackburn apologized for the AI missteps and said successful an August tribunal filing that helium had taken caller grooming courses connected AI and ethics: “I person done everything successful my powerfulness to remediate the mistake, amended myself, and support the integrity of my practice.”


Billboard VIP Pass

But successful Friday’s filing, Fat Joe’s lawyers accidental the aforesaid occupation has cropped up successful their case: “The question is, unfortunately, conscionable the latest illustration of Blackburn’s serial disregard of his ethical obligations,” they wrote. “In summation to disregarding Blackburn’s fictional authorities, the Court should enforce harsh sanctions for this repetition conduct.”

Like galore workers successful 2025, lawyers are progressively utilizing AI to velocity up their work, including researching cases to enactment their arguments. But AI models are known to often mention mendacious facts (known arsenic “hallucinations” successful AI parlance) and lawyers person heightened morals rules that necessitate them to personally certify thing they record successful court. In a study connected AI ethi...

Read Entire Article