Amid Taylor Swift Debate, Charlie Puth Explains Why Some Songs Sound Alike: ‘Stop Demonizing This’

As TikTokers reason implicit whether Taylor Swift’s caller songs dependable similar aged classics, Charlie Puth is taking to societal media to explicate however songwriting really works — telling fans that “there’s lone 12 notes successful a scale” and radical request to “stop demonizing” akin songs.

The singer’s explainer video, posted to TikTok, came amid a week-long net statement implicit respective songs from Swift’s caller medium The Life of a Showgirl, including claims that her “Wood” borrowed excessively overmuch of its dependable from “I Want You Back” by The Jackson 5.

Puth ne'er mentions Swift oregon her caller medium by name, but says helium made the video due to the fact that “lately there’s been a batch of treatment astir erstwhile 2 songs person akin melodies.”

“There’s lone 12 notes successful a scale,” Puth reminded fans, counting them retired connected a keyboard. “So erstwhile you’re penning a caller song, determination are bound to beryllium similarities to an aged song.”

Puth’s video centers connected the contented of interpolation — the intentional usage of existing philharmonic elements from an earlier opus erstwhile penning a caller one. It’s sometimes confused with sampling, which involves adding an existent snippet of a dependable signaling into a caller one.

According to Puth, similarities betwixt 2 melodies lone go full-scale interpolation erstwhile they scope 5 consecutive identical notes. Below that mark, helium says a drawstring of the aforesaid notes is conscionable that — a communal philharmonic instrumentality from a shared taste instrumentality acceptable that doesn’t request to beryllium credited oregon licensed.

To marque the point, helium compared a Fifth Harmony opus to a Hailee Steinfeld song, pointing retired that they commencement with 4 identical notes but past divided successful antithetic sonic directions: “So successful this case, nary interpolation!” Puth said. He past contrasted that with the Portugal. The Man deed “Feel It Still,” which borrowed amply from a 1960s R&B opus — and credits it arsenic such. “In that case, interpolation,” helium said.

While Puth’s video offers invaluable penetration into manufacture signifier from the position of a prolific songwriter, it doesn’t precisely way existent copyright law, which governs erstwhile 1 creator must wage for and recognition the usage of existing material. There is nary hard-and-fast regularisation for the fig of notes that constitutes infringement, and courts typically measurement a broader analysis, including similarities successful different philharmonic elements and whether the archetypal opus is adjacent unsocial capable to warrant copyright protection.

Finding that existent ineligible dividing enactment is overmuch harder than Puth makes it retired to be. In 2015, a national assemblage found that Robin Thicke and Pharrell’s “Blurred Lines” had infringed Marvin Gaye’s “Got To Give It Up” — a verdict wide seen arsenic making it easier to writer implicit similar-sounding songs. But successful a 2022 decision, an appeals tribunal cleared Katy Perry of lifting a information of her “Dark Horse” from an earlier track, ruling that artists indispensable beryllium escaped to reuse communal philharmonic phrases.

Faced with that uncertainty, galore artists, songwriters and grounds labels simply err connected the broadside of caution, offering interpolation licenses and credits successful immoderate concern that is adjacent legally debatable. That’s wherefore Olivia Rodrigo credited

1. Homepage
2. Entertainment
3. Amid Taylor Swift Debate, Charlie Puth Explains Why Some Songs Sound Alike: ‘Stop Demonizing This’