1 month ago
16
Directed by Nico Ballesteros, the documentary is simply a raw, unflinching look down the curtain of West's life, spanning from 2018 to 2024.
9/24/2025
Ye successful "In Whose Name?" Courtesy Photo
At conscionable 18 years old, aspiring filmmaker Nico Ballesteros was fixed the accidental to travel 1 of the astir celebrated radical successful the satellite successful Ye (formerly Kanye West).
Ballesteros whittled 3,000 hours of footage from astir 2018 to 2024 successful West’s pouch to a two-hour documentary, In Whose Name?, which is simply a raw, unflinching look down the curtain of 1 of music’s astir mercurial, brilliant, polarizing and chaotic acts.
The documentary arrived successful astir 1,000 theaters crossed the U.S. connected Friday (Sept. 19). There’s nary shortage of cameos, with appearances from Kim Kardashian, Lady Gaga, LeBron James, Drake, Chris Rock, Diddy, Rihanna, Elon Musk, Pharrell, Swizz Beatz, Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens, Anna Wintour, Virgil Abloh, Playboi Carti, Marilyn Manson and Justin Bieber.
In Whose Name is dispersed retired done a prelude — which calls backmost to ace uncommon archival footage from the 2000s — and 3 acts, on with a little epilogue. It’s not meant to overgarment West successful a peculiar affirmative oregon antagonistic light, but much to supply discourse and a look wrong his past six years of turbulence.
“We don’t cognize if we glued unneurotic the story,” West says successful the doc. “If you’re documenting each astir waking infinitesimal and sometimes sleeping moments of my life, and you don’t recognize the throughline, past the world’s not going to recognize the throughline. It’s conscionable going to look crazy, oregon it’s going to beryllium 1 antic to the adjacent antic, the mode the media words it.”
Ballesteros called the documentary “a revolving doorway of idolatry.” “I deliberation that’s wherefore I created this project, to recognize the quality beneath the idol,” the manager added to NPR.
Fans person been asking themselves “Why, Ye?” plentifulness of times implicit the years, and the doc provides immoderate answers arsenic to his reasoning erstwhile it comes to immoderate of his arguable decision-making — the good, the atrocious and the ugly.
In Whose Name? doesn’t person a large crippled enactment oregon taxable surrounding West arsenic the lone happening linear truly is the timeline pursuing him, but it’s a worthwhile ticker for anyone who is (or was) a instrumentality of the 21-time Grammy Award winner.
Here are 7 standout moments from In Whose Name.